01
Public federal digital asset litigation
Smart contract reallocation analysis, token burn and mint verification, and standing daily transfer digests. Co-authored court-admissible technical fact declarations under tight court deadlines.
Exp Technology Consultants Inc. · San Diego, California
Dr. Andreas Freund embeds with litigation, regulatory and innovation teams as the firm's own technical bench — on-chain tracing, smart contract audits, expert declarations and enterprise legal AI. The same forensic hours your matters already need, at 30–50% lower effective spend, with no vendor retainer locking up client capital.
Bring one live or prospective matter. You leave the call with a feasibility read, a turnaround estimate, and the specific vendor line items that come out of the budget. Conflict check before anything starts. No retainer.
01 — Profile
Founder, Exp Technology Consultants Inc. — San Diego, California
The person who writes the forensic scripts is the same person who sits with the partners filing the declaration. No analyst-to-vendor-to-partner relay, no translation layer, and no hand-off between the technical finding and the legal argument built on it.
His doctorate is in theoretical particle physics — a discipline built on pulling defensible conclusions out of noisy, high-volume data and showing the derivation at every step. Courts ask for the same thing from a technical declaration: method stated, data reproducible, conclusions carried no further than the evidence supports. Alongside it sits large-scale enterprise technology delivery — a $2Bn+ enterprise value track record — and formal process engineering as a certified Six Sigma Black Belt.
A vendor sends a report and an invoice. What a partner actually needs is the finding, the method behind it, and someone who can stand behind both on the court's deadline.
02 — What changes for your practice
Digital asset and AI matters are traditionally routed to forensic accounting firms, intelligence vendors or generalist IT consultants. Replacing that path with an embedded technical advisor changes the economics, the calendar and what the firm can sell.
The same tracing, decompilation and declaration work — without vendor markup, per-matter minimum retainers, or data platform surcharges passed through to the client.
Tracing, code analysis and daily digests come back same-day or within 24 hours, against the one-to-two-week lead time a vendor quotes after its retainer clears.
A DeFi exploit emergency response retainer and a "Know Your Agent" practice group are revenue lines the firm can launch with the technical side already staffed.
Litigation scoping, client pitch support and AI Steering Committee participation sit inside the monthly retainer rather than arriving as a separate vendor invoice.
Conventional
This engagement
03 — Practice benchmarks
Anonymized aggregate data from 15+ active matters with AmLaw 100 digital asset and legal tech practice groups.
Direct savings
$175K–$275K+
Verified vendor fee savings across a standard 12-month term.
Effective rate
30–50%
Reduction in effective hourly spend against external vendor rates.
Capital lockup
$0
No per-matter vendor retainer tying up firm capital before work begins.
Turnaround
24 hrs
Same-day to 24-hour delivery, against 1–2 week vendor lead times.
Data platform surcharges are eliminated entirely: analysis runs on custom scripting rather than licensed third-party subscriptions. The figures above are the summary; vendor rate and retainer detail is available on request.
04 — Representative engagements
Sanitized to public court records and published client alerts. No non-public client representation or case detail appears here.
01
Smart contract reallocation analysis, token burn and mint verification, and standing daily transfer digests. Co-authored court-admissible technical fact declarations under tight court deadlines.
02
Custom Python and Solana forensic scripts analyzing Key Opinion Leader wallet activity and insider trading patterns. Front-running sequences identified without any external software subscription.
03
Code-versus-documentation analysis of GitHub signing paths, formal court declarations prepared, and expert witness preparation led through the engagement.
04
An OCR pipeline and hosted web interface parsing the 600+ page Digital Asset Market Clarity Act into an interactive node graph — established as firm thought leadership and used actively as a client acquisition tool.
Making the case internally? Send your executive committee the value brief →
05 — Service pillars
Each pillar in context, with the value it creates for the firm, is set out in the value brief.
Pillar A
Direct technical investigation and court-admissible evidence preparation for blockchain disputes, regulatory enforcement actions and bankruptcies.
Pillar B
Technical architecture and legislative analysis for digital asset issuers, protocol foundations and financial institution clients.
Pillar C
End-to-end strategy, architecture and deployment of enterprise generative AI and autonomous agent frameworks for firm operations.
Pillar D
Co-developed, client-facing practice lines that pair legal counsel with embedded technical execution.
06 — Press & insights
Peer-reviewed research, opinion pieces, technical articles and interviews on digital asset compliance, blockchain economics and enterprise adoption — each linked to the original.
07 — Working structure
I
Firmwide or practice-group level. Continuous access for litigation scoping, client pitch support, AI Steering Committee participation and public policy tracking.
II
Matter-specific. Allocated hours against active litigation or transactional matters needing forensic tracing, code audits, data science scripting or court declarations.
III
A joint client offering. On-call availability for immediate technical response during live protocol exploits, hacks or emergency regulatory freezes.
All non-public client representations, internal due diligence and proprietary case detail are strictly protected and sanitized. Case studies reference only public court records or published client alerts.
Before any advisory engagement or matter-specific assignment, a formal conflict check is run against existing representations to ensure zero adverse representation. Attorney-client privilege, non-disclosure obligations and legal industry ethics rules govern throughout.
08 — Contact
Twenty minutes on one live or prospective matter, and how an engagement begins from there.
Not ready for a call? Read the value brief first →
Book a time
Open the calendarOr write directly
andreas.freund@exptc.io
Exp Technology Consultants Inc.
11024 Caminito Vista Pacifica
San Diego, CA 92131, USA